Talk:Route 491 (Pennsylvania–Delaware)/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by MathewTownsend in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 17:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Will review. MathewTownsend (talk) 17:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- review
- I made a few edits that you're free to revert.[1], mostly expanding names for clarification.
- What is a "Legislative Route"?
- Clarified. Dough4872 00:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Should make clear CSX's Philadelphia Subdivision.CSX is a railroad. This is a railroad crossing?
- Clarified it's a railroad line. It is a railroad crossing. Dough4872 00:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Everything else is fine. MathewTownsend (talk) 22:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 00:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- ok, I see you have. Good work! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
- c. no original research:
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- fair representation without bias:
- fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- no edit wars, etc:
- no edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass!
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:35, 14 July 2012 (UTC)