Talk:Rowan Robertson

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Ian.thomson in topic Rowan Robertson Wiki mention in interview...

Unverified facts

edit

The page is replete with unverified and uncited facts. FlthyGunslinger 04:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:RowanRobertsonDC4Facebook.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:RowanRobertsonDC4Facebook.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:RowanRobertsonDC4Facebook.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rowan Robertson Wiki mention in interview...

edit

Hey, checking out a new interview with Robertson here: [1] the interviewer mentions Robertsons' Wikipedia article as lacking info in later years, and that now "maybe we’ve given them a chance to get a little more substance behind that. (both laugh)"

The article cited here, in which a reference is made to the Wiki on Robertson refers to a version that no longer exists. See the history of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperWhoLock (talkcontribs)

New stuff goes at the bottom, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Also, the version does exist in the history, all you have to do is click the date on the edit to see that version. The version you and the article were referring to is here. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply