Talk:Roxxon Energy Corporation

Merge?

I feel Roxxon should be merged with Roxxon Oil. Dr Archeville 12:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Survey

• Merge --Newt ΨΦ 15:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge --Chris Griswold 21:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge --Silver lode 23:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge --Hueysheridan 02:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge --Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 02:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Merge --Markeer 15:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge --GentlemanGhost 03:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Decision closed with a decision to merge. --Chris Griswold 08:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

• They're both pretty much stubs right now and could use one another to flesh out one article. --Newt ΨΦ 15:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Royal Dutch/Shell

It seems like it might be a portmanteau of Royal Dutch and Exxon.--Marhawkman 06:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I like your theory; I wouldn't have thought of it. That seems quite possible. Naturally, you would have to find a verifiable source for this before it could go into the article. Still, good thinking! --GentlemanGhost 12:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I was reading about the stuff used in the Amalgam comics. It suddenly occured to me that if most of the character names are portmanteaus, then the organizations might be too. But that's all the evidence I have.--Marhawkman 17:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Article Name

I feel that "Roxxon Energy Corporation" is too new given the length of time the company has existed, and that "Roxxon Oil" is much more familiar. However, to prevent conflict on this, I think the article should be just simply called "Roxxon" (as it is often referred to in the comics) and moved over the redirect. BOZ (talk) 04:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey, sorry, that was my bad. But to be honest, I don't mind either way what the article is called. I just renamed it to be "current", although I've only known it as Roxxon. StarSpangledKiwi (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Agreed, I've also known it more as just "Roxxon" more than anything else, which is why I suggested that. Let's see what some other people think and then make a decision. BOZ (talk) 05:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I say Roxxon is a better name too. Roxxon varies widely in how it is portrayed in comics. Mostly they're an oil company, generally they just serve as faceless evil corporation when needed. --William Graham ^talk 06:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Enron

IIRC, a recent Marvel comic says that Enron, which is a real life scandal ridden company is, in the Marvel Universe, a subsidiary of Roxxon. Should be inserted if a ref can be found. Lots42 (talk) 03:28, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roxxon Energy Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140510080055/http://comicsalliance.com/agents-of-shiel-season-1-recap-episode-21-ragtag/ to http://comicsalliance.com/agents-of-shiel-season-1-recap-episode-21-ragtag/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)