Talk:Roy Ashburn

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Clean up comments:

edit

I quickly realized this page was a major copyright violation taken from his state-senate page (content on state websites, unlike federal websites, are not automatically public domain). Needless to say, because it was taken from his own website it also read somewhat like a re-election campaign advert. I've removed some of POV but kept it mostly in tact. I've also included a pretty amusing (but harmless) quote he gave about wikipedia in The Bakersfield Californian (he must not be too tech savy...). I will add a source reference shortly once I grab the template. Bobak 02:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

request for help with crazy URL

edit

I can't get this URL to work with the cite web template: http://governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_htmldisplay.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@0838993958.1267828241@@@@&BV_EngineID=ccccadejfihjkfmcfngcfkmdffidfnf.0&sCatTitle=Previous+Administration/Press+Release&sFilePath=/govsite/press_release/2001_10/20011012_L01133_CVlegislation.html&sTitle=GOVERNOR+DAVIS+SIGNS+VALLEY+FEVER+VACCINE+LEGISLATION+10/12/2001&iOID=25211 -- it's the press release unlisted in the article refs. Any assistance welcomed. --Joe Decker (talk) 22:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

How about this? Use only ref tags...should be fine.[1] Dmarquard (talk) 19:10, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, while that wasn't exactly precisely what I needed, it was more than close enough to get me over the hump to what I did need. Most appreciated! Thank you! --Joe Decker (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

References

Radio Show Section Needs Some Clean Up Or Clarity

edit

In the cited KERN radio interview with Inga Barks, Ashburn says he resigned from his weekly Saturday radio show the Saturday before these incidents took place, but he did not tell the radio station manangement. Ashburn said, quote, "Without even announcing to the radio station management that I was quiting the show, I simply announced on a Saturday afternoon that this would be my last show." However, KERN did not take down all their websites related to him and his show until directly after Ashburn's incidents on March 3, 2010.

In the cited radio interview (audio on YouTube), Ashburn does not primarily cite that he resigned to avoid a "conflict of interest" as stated in this Wikipeda article. The term and legal principle of "conflict of interest" are likely misleading and incorrect in this case. The term does not describe accurately what Ashburn intended, and the term potentially and unnecessarily portrays Ashburn and KERN in an incorrect light. Ashburn said he quit his show so that KERN would not have to meet federal "equal time requirements" for candidates running for the federal office he was contemplating running for prior to his DUI and related incidents.

I have not heard Ashburn's Feb. 27, 2010 radio show to know if Ashburn announced it would be his last show. This article has no audio citation of that radio broadcast. Onemoreoption (talk) 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

That "conflict of interest" assertion was my fault. I misremembered what he said in the cited clip. I did hear him say at least once on the 27th that it was his last show. KERN records shows for later rebroadcast when someone is sick or on vacation. I'll ask if they did it with his last show. Frotz (talk) 04:54, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Why not edit it then, to reflect the mistake you made? Moncrief (talk) 05:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Someone got to it before I realized my mistake. Frotz (talk) 06:25, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Cue the second clip to 7:15. From there to about 8:35 you'll hear Roy and Inga talking about Roy's now-abandoned plans of running for Congress. Frotz (talk) 06:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I don't know these people, so why would I refer to them as "Roy" and "Inga," which are their first names. Why would you? Actually, I don't care, but please be sure to follow Wikipedia guidelines and use last names as referents after a name's first appearance, not first names. This is an encyclopedia, not a fansite. Moncrief (talk) 19:02, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
There's nothing to get upset about. Frotz (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Template

edit

I have added a template I think might be useful given the circumstances. It is not vandalism. Any questions or complaints I would be happy to respond at my User page. Thanks--Camilo Sanchez (talk) 20:35, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Now removed by Snowolf. I've left a note on your talk page. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Google Search Information

edit

When Roy Ashburn is searched for on Google this is what shows up: Roy Ashburn - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Ashburn - Cached - Similar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherthebrave (talkcontribs) 23:29, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

That's unfortunate caching by Google. Somebody reported it, so it should be gone soon. In the meantime, I've blanked the Google paste per WP:BLP. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 23:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
It's gone, thank goodness. It had been there for less than a minute but that was more than enough for the googlebot to catch it. I can haz Flagged Revisions nao, plz? :/ - Alison 01:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Anti-gay rights != Anti-gay

edit

In regards to "Although maintaining a firmly anti-gay voting record as a Senator, he acknowledged being gay in March 2010.[1]"

A more impartial sentence may read "Although maintaining a firmly anti-gay rights voting record as a Senator, he acknowledged being gay in March 2010.[1]" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.56.53.89 (talk) 12:14, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree. I'm going to be bold, and make the change. Almostfm (talk) 04:09, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sections

edit

Three sections of this article -- DUI arrest, Radio show, and Personal -- contain overlapping information that should probably be consolidated into one or at most two sections. The story of his coming out is covered twice, for example. Do other people agree? Moncrief (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes. I don't think there needs to be a perfect isolation between the sections (if one section covered the orientation stuff and the other the DUI, we'd want to indicate the linkage, etc.) but I'd be for any reorganization of the information into more digestable, logical sections. --Joe Decker (talk) 16:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Roy Ashburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Roy Ashburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply