Talk:Roy McGrath

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Mokadoshi in topic GA Review

Betrayed: The True Story of Roy McGrath

edit

During McGrath's manhunt, a self-published e-book titled Betrayed: The True Story of Roy McGrath was listed on Amazon by an unknown author who gave the name Ryan C. Cooper. He claims that this book is based on McGrath's own manuscripts and interviews between him and the author, and the book makes several claims that were relevant to his federal and state trials, including claims that Hogan had approved his severance payment. However, the book makes these claims without providing any actual evidence, and McGrath's wife says she doesn't even know who Cooper is. A second book was released just a few days ago, this time covering more details about his time as the MES director.

When I was writing this page last night, I decided against mentioning these books, seeing that individuals close to McGrath and the trial had disputed its contents. However, I'd like to get some consensus before I totally close the door on including anything about the book on this page. Would it be appropriate to mention these books on the page? Y2hyaXM (talk) 17:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I've decided to add a paragraph about these books following new reports that showed that McGrath was Ryan C. Cooper. Y2hyaXM (talk) 00:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk07:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Created by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Roy McGrath; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   @TDKR Chicago 101: Good article. Though, earwig looks to have identified some possible copyvio problems and I would like an explanation for it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@TDKR Chicago 101: I'd recommend you to check https://copyvios.toolforge.org/ and check the article for it to see if there are any copyvios that I've called out. I'm not exactly sure if this is a case of WP:MIRROR so I'd like for you to have a look. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
  There used to be paraphrasing but it doesn't look like it's there anymore. Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Onegreatjoke: Is this nom good for posting soon?
@TDKR Chicago 101 and Onegreatjoke: What a riveting story! I was ready to promote this...but was disappointed to find the last sentence of the article is lacking a citation!!! Please add a citation or remove the final comment if it is based on OR or speculation. Cielquiparle (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Cielquiparle: Done! TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Roy McGrath/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mokadoshi (talk · contribs) 05:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   Looks good.
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):   See comments below for lead and layout. Issues fixed. Word choice looks good. Fiction and lists is not applicable.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):   See below. Issues have been fixed.
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):   Earwig gives 24.2%, which is mostly titles and such. In one case I've fixed some close paraphrasing.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   Some comments below. Addressed.
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   Licenses are all good.
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Comments

edit

Lead

edit
  • According to MOS:FIRSTBIO, the first sentence of a biographical article should list noteworthy positions and what they are best known for. Currently, your first sentence is Roy C. McGrath was an American political operative and fugitive...etc.... This definitely satisfies what he's best known for, but I think you should begin the first sentence by introducing him as either the former chief of staff to Hogan, or as "a former Maryland public official" or something similar. Definitely don't want to overload the first sentence, so I'll leave it to you. I might suggest looking at other articles from List of American federal politicians convicted of crimes, like perhaps Duncan D. Hunter. Mokadoshi (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
     Y Lead looks good now, thanks. Mokadoshi (talk) 00:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Layout

edit

Citations

edit

Coverage

edit
  • McGrath resigned in August 2020, and he was not to appear in court until March 2023. Other than the testimonies that he provided in December 2020, is it known what else he did between those dates, other than the testimonies he gave that are already discussed in the article? Mokadoshi (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Mokadoshi I've just made a change that should fix the issues with the lead and "probably misled" citation. I'm working on the other issues now. As for what McGrath did between August 2020 and March 2023, all that's been publicly reported about what McGrath did during this timespan is that he moved from Maryland to Florida, claimed Hogan approved of his severance package, and testified to the Joint Committee on Fair Practices and State Personnel Oversight about his tenure at the MES. Y2hyaXM (talk) 00:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Yep, that's what I thought. I'll mark "broad coverage" as complete then. Mokadoshi (talk) 00:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Mokadoshi I've made further adjustments that should fix the other issues you've added. Please let me know if you have any other recommendations, especially regarding the Steve Thompson article. Thanks for reviewing! Y2hyaXM (talk) 00:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.