Talk:Royal Border Bridge

Comment

I find the laconic revert not good style. But instead of starting multiple reverts I start the discussion page and for a start wait for comments. We have two images used recently:

Royal Border Bridge with 25 of the 28 arches in view.

Hello, I have removed this image from the Royal Border Bridge article. In principle it is taken from a nice viewpoint. It is cloudy, that's Britain. But then the photo is badly stitched (there is better free software out there) and it shows awful JPEG compression artefacts. If the photo were on commons, I would add a category tag for Royal Border Bridge there.

--Klaus with K 12:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Royal Border Bridge with all 28 arches in view.

And we have two references to commons:

My reasoning for the now reverted change is as follows:

1. the previous panorama has significant stitching errors;
2. the more appropriate category Royal Border Bridge exists

--Klaus with K 21:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Border Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060324063802/http://www.sine.ncl.ac.uk/view_structure_information.asp?struct_id=1143 to http://www.sine.ncl.ac.uk/view_structure_information.asp?struct_id=1143

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)