Talk:Royal Jordanian

Latest comment: 5 years ago by WikiAviator in topic Awards Section

PTVs on the A310

edit

The press release on the A310 upgrade on the Royal Jordanian web site (December 2007) shows a picture of the Economy Cabin. It doesn't appear to have PTVs in Economy Class - yet it does say in the article under In Flight Entertainment that there are PTVs is ALL CLASSES ON ALL AIRCRAFT.

Can this be confirmed? Or not? Does Crown Class have PTV in the A310 and Economy doesn't? 166.49.198.26 (talk) 16:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

CROWN CLASS - Has PTV with some 25 channels. ECONOMY CLASS - Doesn't currently, but will by the end of 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.129.98 (talk) 09:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

AirMeals served

edit

Don't you think its a bit worthy to put such section? I can provide with two different photographs (Self-Made) --- Omernos 16:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:1worldfinsnew.jpg

edit
 

Image:1worldfinsnew.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 23:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Royal Jordanian Logo.png

edit
 

Image:Royal Jordanian Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

A321s

edit

Are the 2 A321s in order really replacing "older" 321s? They have only 4 and oldest are delivered in 1995!

195.197.175.20 13:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

RJ has leased 2 321s from ILFC, which will arrive on Q2 2008. They should replace older 321s (F-GTAF and F-OHGU). The other two are JY-registered and only a couple of years old. -- Trsqr 20:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Royal Jordanian Logo.png

edit
 

Image:Royal Jordanian Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 17:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Trivia

edit

This page is filled with trivia, you cannot expect the page to handle every new destination, rather, i suggest moving to a page called "destinations of Royal Jordanian. Do I get any yeas?

This page also has multiple entries for history in 2007, i suggest that they be written as a paragraph.

raraa 15:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Stuff

edit

http://www.rj.com/dynamic_pages/include_jordan_city_areas.asp WhisperToMe (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Inbox in problem

edit

Please somebody revert back it into older version. I saw something wrong with the inbox template, or maybe someone did it before. I've tried to correct it, but doesn't work. Sorry and thank you. Reindra (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

No destination information?

edit

No destination information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.178.169.119 (talk) 16:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Royal Jordanian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Jordanian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Awards Section

edit

The part look like an advertisement. I will remove it because it may involve conflict of interest. WikiAviator (talk) 05:06, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply