Talk:Royal Naval Artillery Volunteers
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Desertarun in topic Did you know nomination
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Naval Artillery Volunteers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Royal Naval Artillery Volunteers appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! | ![]() |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 07:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Royal Naval Artillery Volunteers were "not really wanted" by the Royal Navy and were disbanded less than 20 years after their 1873 founding? " "The Royal Naval Artillery Volunteers (R.N.A.V.) existed from 1873 until 1892 but was not really wanted by the Navy" from: Lilley, Terrence Dawson (June 2012), Operations of the Tenth Cruiser Squadron: A Challenge for the Royal Navy and its Reserves (PDF) (PhD thesis), University of Greenwich, p. 97
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 08:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC).
- Long enough, new enough, QPQ done, no copyvio, cited, neutral. All good for DYK. I could ask about why those links are in further reading, but DYK doesn't need them. So yeah. GeraldWL 02:26, 3 June 2021 (UTC)