Talk:Royal Northumberland Fusiliers
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Northumberland Fusiliers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editTo any Northumbrian The 5th are the RNF sentiment apart a good idea js1 21:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Pte. S Uswin - 1st Batallion 5th Northumberland Fusiliers
editHi,
I have a medal from the second Afghan War of 1878 which belongs to Private S Uswin and would love to find out more information about him and the batallion's record in this particular war. Anyone able to help? My email is -redacted-. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.105.118.8 (talk) 11:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- This page is really supposed to eb for discussing improvements to the article. However, your best hope for more information on Unwin himself would be to see if his service record is held by The National Archives, see http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/militaryhistory/army/step4.htm for some info on gettign started. For info on the abttalion, there's almost certainly a regimental history, published accounts of the Second Afghan War would also be a good place to start. David Underdown (talk) 12:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- The second Afghan war medal roll for this regiment should contain additional information about his service in the Second Anglo-Afghan War Kernel Saunters (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I know that the page is for discussion on improvements, but given that those discussing improvements have to have knowledge of the regiment I thought there might be some pertinent information - and there way. Thanks again for your help!
- The second Afghan war medal roll for this regiment should contain additional information about his service in the Second Anglo-Afghan War Kernel Saunters (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Signalling incorrect link on RNFusiliers page
editDear readers, editors and administrators
I am researching my great uncle who served with the NF in Salonika in 1915-1916. Please note that the link to "Balkans Campaign" under 2nd Battalion, between "Battle of Loos" and "Battle of Doiran", creates a link to the a page concerning hostilities and actions in WWII ... This is clearly an error, the correct link is missing.
I don't know how to proceed from here, and am reluctant to remove this without having something to suggest in its place???
Macthaidhg (talk) 07:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Done Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Sweeney Thank you for replacing the link, and so speedily too. Well done. Nice to see that some people are on the ball.
Macthaidhg Macthaidhg (talk) 12:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Northumberland Fusiliers
editThe Fifth (Northumberland) Regiment were granted the distinction of being a Fusilier regiment in 1836, becoming thereafter the 5th Regiment of Foot (Northumberland Fusiliers). The latter was the title adopted in 1881 when regimental numbers were abolished.JF42 (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Dr. John Watson
editI'm not sure if this belongs here, but Dr. John Watson (fictional doctor associated with Sherlock Holmes), was "duly attached to the Fifth Northumberland Fusiliers as Assistant Surgeon." [1]
Does this belong in this article? Thank you! Crusherdave (talk) 14:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
References
edit- ^ Doyle, Arthur Conan (1887). "I. Mr. Sherlock Holmes" (eBook). A Study in Scarlet. Project Gutenburg. Retrieved 19 January 2015.
Aden 1967?
editThere ought to be some mention of their involvement in the Aden Emergency, just before the evacuation of the colony. Valetude (talk) 10:43, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Royal Northumberland Fusiliers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071116141038/http://www.gc-database.co.uk:80/recipients/KinneDG.htm to http://www.gc-database.co.uk/recipients/KinneDG.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Royal Northumberland Fusiliers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/depot/1873.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/005RNF.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703100714/http://www.angloboerwar.com/units%20imperial/northumberland_fus.htm to http://www.angloboerwar.com/units%20imperial/northumberland_fus.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)