Talk:Royal Society for the Protection of Nature, Bhutan

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Copyvio revert

edit

I have removed the bulk of this article because of the apparent copyright violation. The web source indicates its work is subject to copyright (Bhutanese). While the editor that started this article may be the RSPN webmaster, there is no indication that person has actual authority to reproduce government text, let alone whether the editor is the original author. In any event, Wikipedia is not a mirror, among many other things. The website is likely a reliable source about certain aspects, but should not be appear verbatim in cobbled swaths. JFHJr () 05:59, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Society for the Protection of Nature, Bhutan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply