Talk:Rubab (instrument)

Untitled

The rubab is an AFGHAN instrument. I don't understand what relevance Iran has with it. It is mostly played and made in Afghanistan. And also, I had a nice big picture of the RUBAB. Please stop changing this page. 72.196.229.15 20:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I don't understand why Afghanistan is not in this article. The rubab/robab is the national instrument of AFGHANISTAN. Other countries like Iran and Pakistan only use it in their classical music. And plus, the only places the rubab is played is in areas near Afghanistan (like Khorasan - which is basically the city of Herat in Afghanistan). It originated from there, and I think it should be included in the article. This article needs modification. Whoever keeps changing this, please fix it. 72.196.229.15 21:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)РУБАБ НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ ИНСТРУМЕНТ ИРАНСКИХ НАРОДОВ И ТЕРМИНАЛОГИЯ РУБАБ ТОЖЕ ИМЕЕТ ПЕРСИДСКОЕ НАЗВАНИЯ.ДРУГИХ НАРОДОВ ВОТ КОТОРЫЕ ГОДЫ ИСПОЛЬУЗЕТ ОТ ИРАНСКИХ НАРОДОВ И ЭТО ТОЖЕ ХОРОШО!

Hey, I just noticed, most of this is just copy pasted from the article Afghan Rubab. This is VANDALISM. You have to make up your own sentences.72.196.229.15 21:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

DOES IT MATTER? EVERYONE KNOWS THE RUBAB IS AN AFGHAN INSTRUMENT ANYWAYS!

The Rubab is an Afghan instrument

Saying Rubab is an Iranian instrument is like saying the Hindustani tabla is from China, get the fact right please. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yasser karimzad (talk • contribs) 04:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Homayun Sakhi.jpg

Image:Homayun Sakhi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

rubab-rabab-rebab

I do not think it is going to be possible to keep this material separate from rebab. For one thing, material gets added to the wrong pages, for another the Sikh rebab is called rebab but is descended from plucked rubab, which is descended from bowed rebab (has to be since the word means "bowed") I propose a merge. Redheylin (talk) 02:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't think it should be merged. The Afghan Rabab is different from the other Rubabs which are bow type instuments while the rabab is more guitar like. Akmal94 (talk) 12:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rubab (instrument). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061118162205/http://www.sarod.com:80/sarod/default.htm to http://www.sarod.com/sarod/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Etymology section

Unfortunately I'm not an expert on this topic so I'd rather not touch this article, but in July and August 2016 a large chunk of text was inserted into the article that seemed to consist largely of quotations and was largely off-topic, excessive or simply low quality and unhelpful. Most of it has already been removed, but the "Etymology" section is still of dubious value and quality, and might be best off removed altogether. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 18:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

I've now removed it myself. The sections "Size variants", "Components" and "Notable players" also have problems of varying severity, but may be salvageable at least. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 18:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

I've edited the "Components" section and added wikilinks, based on my knowledge of western fretted instruments: I may have got some of the terms wrong, but hopefully it's an improvement. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 09:42, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Size variants

Should the size of the instrument not be in metric units? It’s a trivial thing but Wikipedia should not be seen as a parochial US repository. Afghanistan is metric (has been since the 1920’s) as is some 95% of the world population. (I’m an old Brit, so inches mean something to me, not so to most people). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:5B95:FA01:F1F9:F650:C929:806B (talk) 10:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)