Talk:Runcorn/Archive 1

Archive 1

Assessment Report

1. Article needs to be expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
2. Make the article more encyclopaedic
3. As a reminder: References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. There should be a greater use of "in-line" citations. (See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)

 DDStretch  (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

---

Revised Assessment

1. A really good and major improvement in the article. I would put it in for at least Good Article status.

 DDStretch  (talk) 00:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Like a tourist guide

This isn't a very encyclopedic layout, it set out more like a travel guide. Please correct it. Thanks DannyM 19:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Danny. I agree; the article is a mess. I am new to Wikipedia and did not know what to expect but was certainly surprised to see the content of this page. I have already had to revert quite a bit of vandalism. Why not have a go at some of it yourself? Only I should be grateful if you could leave the bits I have added - History after 1656, the population table, the photo, the References and the Further reading. Much of the rest could (should?) go in my opinion - most of sections 5 to 12. What do you think? PS I live in Runcorn. Peter I. Vardy 21:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

It is a mess. The facts are mainly there, I was more concerned about the layout, I live in Warrington (your local neighbour lol). So I'll have a go after a short break for Christmas :). All the Best DannyM 22:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

I removed several of the obvious tourist-orinenated information. I however, converged much of the text from the tourist sections into the main body, mainly as an expansion on what had been written previously. (This comment made on 01:41, December 27, 2006 by User:Auzdafluff.)

Revision

This article has been the subject of criticism. Following the advice given above I have more or less re-written it in what I hope is a more "encyclopaedic" style. So my apologies to all previous editors who have contributed so much. I hope this version is more to the liking of those who are familiar with Wiki standards and guidelines. Constructive comments are of course welcome. Peter I. Vardy 14:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Geography

Having just done a quick sweep of the article (which looks great!), I'd just like to point out that the Physical geography and geology section doesn't include much about physical geography and geology - it mainly includes content about transport links, and thus needs a little attention to get it right.

The Geography and administration may also benefit from a Civic history section, outlining changes to local government and administrative changes throughout the ages.

Other than this, I suspect this article would reach, WP:GA. Jhamez84 00:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Reorganisation

It might be an idea to check the sectioning for the following reason: A bid for GA status by Middlewich has just failed, with one of the reasons being that its sectioning didn't comply with the advice given in WP:CITIES and that the sectioning given in Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements differed from that suggested in WP:CITIES. Now I don't want to get into a dispute about whether guidelines written for USA cities should be or should not be used to evaluate articles about UK towns for GA status, but i will comment that the UK guidelines have subsequently been edited by someone to make them come more into line with the WP:CITIES set of guidelines, and so if GA status is applied for, it may be as well to try to abide by the edited guidelines. (Though I must admit to being slightly irriatted at this "chantging of the goalposts" by editing the guidelines that is going on.) I hope I have described the main deatils of this correctly.  DDStretch  (talk) 12:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I've done a bit more on this, partly as suggested by Jhamez84. One point of criticism by the WP:GA assessor of Middlewich was the "Present day" heading, which I agree makes no sense, so I have removed that. Looking at the headings in WP:CITIES, this article includes info relating to all of them, not necessarily in their order or under their precise headings, plus a few more sections which I think are appropriate in this article for an encyclopaedia. But I've changed/added headings to more closely reflect the (USA) guidelines. Do other editors think we should reorganise further or leave it more or less as it is? Peter I. Vardy 14:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I might raise at the UK Geography WikiProject that the UK may require a UK-specific cities guide, as this problem has occured a few times. I understood that the WP:CITIES guide related to cities, and the UK geography guidelines related to smaller settlements (towns, villages, hamlets, wards and districts). We also have the problem that many cities form local government districts (such as Manchester - which also require a different approach). In the meantime, the Runcorn article looks good. You may wish to look at other GA-class UK geography articles. Jhamez84 17:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I think it would definitely help. The GA reveiewer did a good job for Middlewich, but as he is a USA citizen, resident there, he probably did not know some of the country-specific issues that a UK person might know, thus enabling a UK person to intuitively customise the advice given in WP:CITIES for the UK case. In fact, it may be a good thing to flag this up on the WP:CITIES article (there is a template:Globalize/USA template that could be used - I've used it successfully on Psychiatry, for example, to get people to start considering the training of psychiatrists outside the USA.)  DDStretch  (talk) 17:49, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Shaw and Crompton is a GA article that uses the UK geography settlement guidelines. I didn't think either guideline was mandatory though! That said, I think developing a WP:UKCITIES guide would be the right step forwards anyway, not only for this article, but many, many others. Jhamez84 18:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I've added a section on Religion. This section does not appear in the guidance but I think it should be there; if you have education and schools, why not have religion and churches/chapels? And I think the history of religion in Runcorn is quite interesting, especially the Methodist growth in the early 19th century. Perhaps this could form part of the discussion with the UK Geography WikiProject. What do others think? Peter I. Vardy 15:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

GA review

Pass! Great work. Epbr123 11:44, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Lead

The article is undergoing peer review and following the advice here and support from WikiProject Cheshire here I have modified the lead removing the item criticised for leading to possible confusion and a need for further explanation, which would be out of place in the lead. Peter I. Vardy 10:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Roger Lees

I am not convinced that this person is of sufficient status to be included in the 'Notable people' section. I suspect this is a link to the website of an advertising nature. Unless I can be convinced otherwise within the next 10 days, the reference to him will be deleted. Peter I. Vardy 16:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Deleted accordingly. Peter I. Vardy 09:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Image in Lead

At a recent change in layout the image of the Silver Jubilee Bridge was moved from its position at the top of the article to below the info box. In this latter position it means nothing. Its position at the top was not criticised by either the assessor for GA status or by the peer reviewer. I have therefore returned it to the top of the article where it gives more impact to the reader. Peter I. Vardy 10:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

It's now in the info box. Peter I. Vardy 11:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Climate

"Being close to the west coast and the Irish Sea, the climate is generally temperate with few extremes of temperature or weather. The mean average temperature in the years 1971 to 2000 was 9.4 to 9.7°C, which was slightly above the average for the United Kingdom[38] as was the average amount of annual sunshine at 1391 to 1470 hours."

I think the mathematical descriptions are wrong here. First of all what does "mean average" mean? I imagine it means the "arithmetic mean", so it should be called either the mean or the average.

Secondly, statements like "the average ... was 9.4 to 9.7" don't make arithmetic sense. The average is a single value, like 9.5. The met office maps cited group averages together into ranges for ease of visualisation, so all that can be said is the average temperature is somewhere in the range between 9.4 and 9.7. Not that the average temperature was 9.4 to 9.7. An average can't be given as a range in other words. Isn't it possible to find out what the actual averages for Runcorn are? Or perhaps you could take an average of the range, and say, for instance, "the average annual rainfall was around 805 mm". --Malleus Fatuarum 14:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for your comments. The figures were taken from the Met Office website without further interpretation. Does anyone have the mathematical/scientific ability to make better sense of the figures? And does anyone know where the precise figures for Runcorn or Halton can be found? Peter I. Vardy 08:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

If there are no figures available for Runcorn, then I'd suggest averaging the met office's range, as in "around 805mm". --Malleus Fatuarum 09:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Town Park

Just a very small thing. "... and an extensive Town Park created as part of the new town."

This seems a little odd to me. Is the name of the park "Town Park"? If it isn't, then why is it capitalised, and if it is, then why doesn't it say "... the extensive Town Park"? --Malleus Fatuarum 21:08, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for the suggestion/correction — "an" changed to "the". Peter I. Vardy 09:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Polythene

I've just discovered that polythene was discovered in ICI's Runcorn laboratories. Worth adding to the history section? --Malleus Fatuarum 21:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

• It was discovered in Winnington, which is in Northwich, not Runcorn. Peter I. Vardy 09:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

http://archive.thisischeshire.co.uk/2006/8/23/275816.html

Sketch map of Runcorn

I have edited the original sketch map I loaded yesterday to incorporate Peter I. Vardy's comments (copied below):

Could the Old Town centre be indicated; this is quite important in the context of the town and the article. I agree the railways are a bit complicated. Perhaps we could have the Liverpool–London line because it crosses Runcorn Gap parallel to the road bridge and this links up with the images. To the east of the town it is more complicated because the main branch of the West Coast Main line crosses the Manchester–Chester line. Perhaps it would be possible to include the latter (mainly because of Runcorn East station) and leave out the WCML.

The Old Town centre is now indicated (using Egerton & Church St as reference points, as it wasn't marked on my map). I have also included some of the railway lines, including the two stations. I've also refined the coast line a little on the River Mersey to clarify the Runcorn Gap.

However, the map now seems a little cluttered to me, especially as many of the labels had to be moved to accommodate the new railway lines, and unfortunately the main 'Runcorn' label falls inevitably on top of the railway. One solution might be to have two maps, one under geography lacking the railway lines, and another including the railways but with some other information removed under transport? The original map is still loaded at Commons (Runcorn_Cheshire_map.png [1]) if consensus prefers it. Espresso Addict 00:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

• I think it's fine as it is. OK it looks a bit cluttered at first sight but enlarged it's fine — it reflects the fact that geographically it is a rather complex town. Peter I. Vardy 08:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

GA Pass

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Epbr123 17:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Citation requested

Telefonica O2 (telecommunications) employing nearly 2000 people at its main call centre site in Preston Brook, is the current highest employer in Runcorn.

I've moved this here from the Economy section until an appropriate source can be found. --Malleus Fatuorum 15:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

1980's Series called truckers" was also shot in runcorn Old town 1980's Series , traveling man" was also filmed in the Marina Village part of the town on the canal, moved from the Filmography section - unreferenced and unlinked. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:37, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Tony Ferguson

"Tony Ferguson, Bass Player for The Troubadours is also from Runcorn. " - the citation does not say he is from Runcorn. Moved here from the mainspace until this can be resolved. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Hein Curve

Someone once told me that the main orbital road around Runcorn is a Hein Curve (see Piet Hein (Denmark)). Does anyone have a reference for that so we can include it in the article? --Northernhenge (talk) 21:52, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

By Hein Curve I presume you mean a type of superellipse. The Expressway system was originally intended to be in the form of a "figure-of-8", but the easternmost section of this had to be omitted for financial reasons, so we are left with a sort of "8" with its top missing. Looking at a map of Runcorn, the western section of the Expressway could be said to appear something like a superellipse, but this is accidental because of topographical and residential factors. To call it a Hein Curve would IMO be an artificial construct and not be a reflection of any planning intention - or does anyone have a reliable reference to the contrary?--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:47, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Uncited material

Removed from main space: "Another possible translation is from the Old English Rúncofa meaning the chamber of secret counsel, chamber of secrets.". Awaiting confirmation/citation--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC).

Proposal to move Silver Jubilee Bridge to Runcorn Bridge

There is a discussion at Talk:Silver Jubilee Bridge#Requested move regarding moving the article to Runcorn Bridge or possibly Runcorn-Widnes Bridge. Please participate. Bazonka (talk) 07:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Edward Smith (sea captain)

I have deleted the reference to Smith's intention to retire to Runcorn after Titanic's maiden cruise. It was uncited, and I have found no reliable evidence to support it. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Uncited material

The following has been moved from the article because it is uncited. If a suitable citation can be found, it can be restored, with appropriate copyediting.

"Rucorn had two cinemas The Scala in the High Street, which became a dance hall and then bingo and The Empress in Lowlands Road, which was the head office for Cheshire County Cinemas, run by the Godfrey family. There was over one thousand seats and a balcony. The Empress ran films from Monday to Saturday. Usually they had two three-day programmes often showing two features and a newsreel. Up in the projection room there were two Westar projectors with Western Electric sound. Light was provided by two Peerless carbon arcs.The cinema was equipped to show four track magnetic stereo films. These were few and far between, most films had a mono optical track. For many years the manager was a Mr John Darlington. The last manager being a Mr Horton. The cinema closed in 1973 and was demolished to make way for extensive road improvements.Cinema was moved to the shopping city where twin cinemas opened.After entering the building you had to go down steps to enter the foyer area.The cinemas were one level halls, having no balcony. The Westar machines from the Empress were installed with tower projection. This means the whole feature was shown on one reel. At the Empress there were changeovers, reels could only carry up to twenty-two minutes of film. The projection light source at the twin cinemas was xenon."

--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:48, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Runcorn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070108232842/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_compendia/region_in_figures_winter04/North_West.pdf to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_compendia/region_in_figures_winter04/North_West.pdf#page=24
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070702011047/http://www2.halton.gov.uk:80/content/councilanddemocracy/council/research/factbook?a=5441 to http://www2.halton.gov.uk/content/councilanddemocracy/council/research/factbook?a=5441
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070712101205/http://www2.halton.gov.uk:80/content/environment/towncentres/traditionalmarkets?a=5441 to http://www2.halton.gov.uk/content/environment/towncentres/traditionalmarkets?a=5441
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070413101824/http://www2.halton.gov.uk:80/content/tourismandleisure/sports?a=5441 to http://www2.halton.gov.uk/content/tourismandleisure/sports?a=5441

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Climate data and slow-motion edit-war

Can I ask all of you who seem to be engaged in this slow-motion edit war to stop doing what you are doing, and discuss the issue on this talk page, rather than by terse messages in edit-summaries? I have asked the person who keeps on adding material not entirely relevant to this article to stop doing so and to take part in discussions here.  DDStretch  (talk) 07:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Ok. I've totally protected the article until the apparently-new editor and those who take issue with the addition of unsourced and arguably irrelevent material can sort it out here.  DDStretch  (talk) 02:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

I have removed weather material again [2] by an editor who is using what seems to be their own self published website as a source.SovalValtos (talk) 08:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Runcorn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120522145306/http://www3.halton.gov.uk/councilanddemocracy/statisticsandcensusinformation/145135/ to http://www3.halton.gov.uk/councilanddemocracy/statisticsandcensusinformation/145135/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070901235840/http://www.haltoncastle.org/ to http://www.haltoncastle.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011154117/http://www.rossbullock.co.uk/ to http://www.rossbullock.co.uk/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://iccheshireonline.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100regionalnews/tm_objectid%3D17001927%26method%3Dfull%26siteid%3D50020%26headline%3Dex-hear-say-star-s-passion-for-runcorn--name_page.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061106224530/http://www2.halton.gov.uk/ to http://www2.halton.gov.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)