This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Details
editI think it's important to put in a link to the details behind the RPA payment system problems; there are some details in the official transcript here: [[1]] Gilesmorant 18:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I've put back some of the critical material that was removed from here, and moved some from Single Payment Scheme. I've added citations with the style guide in front of me, but it might need some formatting cleanup. (I'm new here). - Amcguinn 10:10, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Is it still true that BPA distributes payments made under the European Union Common Agricultural Policy? Hasn't the UK's exit from the EU changed that? BPCSPD95 (talk) 12:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:RPA logo.jpg
editImage:RPA logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Size and shape of vegetables and fruit
editThis article says, "It also enforces the European Union's regulations on the size and shape of vegetables and fruit sold in shops..." but I heard on National Public Radio that the EU has recently changed those regulations to remove some produce from the rules. Perhaps something could be added to this article, or elsewhere, to reflect that. Apparently, in some places the produce was thrown awahttp://en.wikipedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_sig.pngy, while in other places the regulations were ignored. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Rural Payments Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090723131535/http://www.rpa.gov.uk:80/rpa/index.nsf/UIMenu/F51B6B0D961521A7802570450051BAB9?Opendocument to http://www.rpa.gov.uk/rpa/index.nsf/UIMenu/F51B6B0D961521A7802570450051BAB9?opendocument
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060626140605/http://www.daelnet.co.uk:80/countrynews/country_news_16032006_6.cfm to http://www.daelnet.co.uk/countrynews/country_news_16032006_6.cfm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130414110545/http://www.defra.gov.uk:80/news/2013/01/03/paterson-speech-ofc-2013/ to http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2013/01/03/paterson-speech-ofc-2013/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)