Talk:Russia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1995

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1995/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Time to get rid of this old nomination! --K. Peake 09:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• The songwriters are not directly sourced anywhere in the body as they should be
• Wikilink Philipp Kirkovov in the lead
• "to select Russian entrant." → "to select the Russian entrant."
• To avoid the lead being too cluttered, you should start a new para at Vocal Band
• "due to the band members being" → "due to the members being"
• Wikilink music video
• I think it is worth noting that the placing was their worst result

  Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Background

• Introduce RTR and ORT by their full names per this being the first mentions in the body
• "which will represent Russia" → "which would represent Russia"

  Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Before Eurovision

Evrovidenie "Pesnya-95"

• Wikilink Philipp Kirkorov on the img text
• "jury came to" → "the jury came to"

  Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• Table looks good!

Internal selection

• "due to the group's members inability" → "due to the members' inability"
• Wikilink Philip Kirkorov
• Wikilink music video
• "to the public on 30 April 1995" → "to the public the next day"

  Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

At Eurovision

• Img looks good!
• Pipe previous year's contest to Eurovision Song Contest 1994
• "participation in 1994 contest" → "participation in the 1994 contest"
• "didn't participate in 1994 contest." → "didn't participate in this contest."
• "in 1994 contest," → "in the 1994 contest," but where is this 17 part sourced?
• "Philipp Kirkorov took part in" → "Kirkorov took part in"
• "on 8 and 10 May," → "on 8 and 10 May 1995,"
• "wearing white shirt and" → "wearing a white shirt and"
• "was the Russia's worst placing" → "was Russia's worst placing"
• "had won the contest;" → "had emerged as winners;"
• "the Russian singer."" only keep inside speech marks if this is a full sentence per MOS:QUOTE

  Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Voting

• "for 1995 contest," → "for the Eurovision Song Contest 1995," since this is a new sub section
• "to the ten highest-ranking songs" → "to the 10 highest-ranking songs" per MOS:NUM
• "assembled 16-member jury panel," → "assembled a 16-member jury panel,"
• Pipe Lora Kvint to Квинт, Лора Геннадьевна

  Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• Table looks good!

References

• Copyvio score looks phenomenal at 4.8%!!!!
• Why is EBU only in brackets on ref 1?

  Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 2 and 18

  Can you explain in more detail what needs to be done, because I tried to fix it, but it got worse and messy. Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• Ref 4 is government owned, so are you sure about the reliability?

  Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 7 and what exactly makes this source reliable?

  Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• What is ref 8 and why is it reliable?

  Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• Pipe Raidió Teilifís Éireann to RTÉ

  Done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• Is ref 20 WP:USERG?

  I don't think so. I looked through this site and found no evidence that this site is self-published. - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Bibliography

• Pipe Carlton Books to Welbeck Publishing Group
• Wikilink Telos Publishing

  Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this should not take very long! --K. Peake 17:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

  Pinging the nominator: {{u|Danilmay}}, since this article has not been change since this review has been on hold for 6 days now. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 20:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

K. Peake, I've made almost all the changes you've requested. Only I had one question (added above). Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Danilmay MOS:QWQ issues are when you have used double speech marks inside reference titles; replace with singular ones ('). --K. Peake 15:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

K. Peake: Done - Danilmay (talk) 17:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• ✓ Pass now, this is totally fine! --K. Peake 19:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)