Talk:Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895)
 | Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895) is part of the Petropavlovsk class battleships series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 3, 2014. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Condition of ship at start of August 9th
editIn the section "Wartime service", it says that the Sevastopol "was not fully repaired, having one inoperable 12 inch gun turret in her aft."
I think this needs re-wording. But, does it mean that one of the two guns in the aft turret was inoperable, or that the entire turret was inoperable? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Also, in the same section, it says that the admiral "ordered six separate waves of destroyers to sink the battleship, some of which were launched from the Fuji and Mikasa". This makes it sound as if the destroyers were launched by the Fuji and the Mikasa? Does it in fact mean that the Fuji and Mikasa also launched some torpedoes, as well as the destroyers launching torpedoes? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:57, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've fixed both problems. Buggie111 (talk) 23:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Two things
editBum sentence: "Immediately after the surrender of Port Arthur, Sevastopol was scuttled to prevent her capture by the Imperial Japanese Navy and never raised." Can it be fixed, please? Also, I footnoted the Cyrillic equivalent of the ship's name, since it seems hardly necesary on en.WP to clutter the opening with the phonetically same rendering in a script English-speakers don't know. But the number is kind of big, so please revert if you don't like it. Tony (talk) 11:15, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- I've fixed and reverted. Buggie111 (talk) 14:32, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111016030023/http://flot.com/history/si31.htm to http://www.flot.com/history/si31.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)