Talk:Russian destroyer Gadzhibey
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
Russian destroyer Gadzhibey has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 19, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Russian destroyer Gadzhibey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian destroyer Gadzhibey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 14:10, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Criteria
editGA Criteria
|
---|
GA Criteria:
|
- No DAB links
- No dead links
- No missing citations
Discussion
editProse Suggestions
editPlease note that all of these are suggestions, and can be implemented or ignored at your discretion.
- honor of the victories of Admiral Fyodor Ushakov suggest honor of the victorious battles of Admiral Fyodor Ushakov
- The destroyer bombarded Alushta before it was captured by the amphibious detachment, suggest The destroyer bombarded Alushta before the city was captured by the amphibious detachment, kind of confusing; initially thought the Gadzhibey had been captured.
- @Kges1901 and Sturmvogel 66: That is all my suggestions, passing now. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- Good ideas both. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)