Talk:Russian monitor Admiral Greig/GA1
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Auntieruth55 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 14:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Sturm, I'll get to this in the next couple of days or so.....auntieruth (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]y]): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]y]): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: