Talk:Russian monitor Vitse-admiral Popov

Russian monitor Vitse-admiral Popov has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 10, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian monitor Vitse-admiral Popov/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 01:30, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

What a fun looking little ship... though I can't imagine the difficulty in making her actually go anywhere.

My first and major comment is that the lead calls her one of the worst warships ever built, and then this is never mentioned again. If she's that bad, there has to be a source or two to discuss her unusual legacy. Indeed, you list Preston in the bibliography, but never use the work in your citations.
- It appears that I rushed the nom on this. Should be good now.
Last paragraph as the article stands lacks any sourcing at all?
Now to picking nits: "roubles" or "rubles", but not both.
Any idea what "popovka" translates to?
- Clarified.
"Her bluff hull form" Might be worth linking bluff to here?
- Excellent idea.
"So much so that it took 40–45 minutes" Feels like a continuation of the prior sentence, not a well-written sentence on its own.
- Agreed, attached it to the prior sentence with a semi-colon.
" two 37-millimetre (1.5 in) quick-firing Hotchkiss five-barreled revolving cannon." Two of them, so, cannons?
- Not necessarily, cannon, like aircraft, is both singular and plural.

That's all I've got, the first two are the big ones. Courcelles (talk) 01:30, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. See if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Looks good, passing. Courcelles (talk) 19:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic