 | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Spoiler warning
editI put the spoiler warning on and moved the screencap, but I haven't read the article. I came just to get the actor's name, and was confronted with spoilers for a series that hasn't aired in Australia yet. Can someone please rewrite it so that the first paragraph does not contain spoilers at all, just basic information about the character? RoseWill 23:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Episode 505 282 0001.jpg
edit
Image:Episode 505 282 0001.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Updates
editThis page needs one heck of an update soon, hopefully once the next Season of Spooks comes around, there should be enough information about Ruth to bring her back into the present tense in this article, which in turn should allow for a complete rewrite. Hopefully, this should remove all of the issues with this article too. AJ (talk) 20:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Just did a further rewrite of "voice". Why the notability tag when it's like a book article. The source is the book or character itself & wouldn't otherwise be tertiary information (excepting reviews, but reviews relate to the show in this case, not a character). Imo the tags can go. Manytexts (talk) 11:42, 20 December 2010 (UTC)