Talk:São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2004 Summer Olympics

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2004 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

I think I'll have this completed by tomorrow JAGUAR  15:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

• The lead should be expanded to reach a minimum of two paragraphs so it can comply per WP:LEAD and also help with the organisation of this article

•  Done. I did make some changes to the last paragraph. Let me know that the edits were OK.

• "Usually, an NOC would be able to enter three qualified athletes" - a NOC, or even "the" would work

•  Already done. I corrected this before you started the review.

• Again it shoudl be explained what the "A" and "B" standards for athletes? This should be explained somewhere in the article for people unfamiliar

•  Done

• This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as the GA critera 3(a) is looking for. I would recommend any small expansion if possible but if this is not possible I'm willing to let this go as I believe the reliable sources implemented in this article are make it broad as it is

  Expanded it a bit. Sadly I couldn't find as much infomation as I did with Vanuatu at the 2004 Summer Olympics.

References

• No dead links

On hold

Sorry this took so long. Much like the last article this is a compact article despite the short review, so I'll leave this on hold until everything can be clarified. Again I suggested an expansion of the lead and anywhere else in the article (if possible) as it may not meet the broadness part of the criteria. But let me know if you have any questions, good luck JAGUAR  12:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

@Jaguar: Thanks for the review. I could not find as much infomation as I did with Vanuatu at the 2004 Summer Olympics sadly. Still, I managed to expand it a bit, so I hope this now meets the GA criteria. Good888 (talk) 13:52, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks again! You've done a good job with this article and with that it now meets the GA criteria, well done JAGUAR  19:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)