This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Not really sure about the policy but it says there is little known of the king. Should this be in here or should it be included that little is know in comparison to other kings but this is what we know...? Coralshin (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Late answer, but anyway. I think the point of that statement is to give the reason why little is known: his reign is period of chaos and disintegration. When people fight wars, civil wars, war with rebellious provinces, this tends to reduce such activities as putting stylus in a piece of clay to write history. This is an important point to make, because otherwise readers think Wikipedia is so incomplete. Jcwf (talk) 03:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Please note that almost all of these are suggestions, and can be implemented or ignored at your discretion. Any changes I deem necessary for the article to pass GA standards I will bold.
He was a eunuch and probably a prominent courtier already during the reign of Ashurbanipal (r. 669–631 BC). suggest He was a eunuch and probably already a prominent courtier during the reign of Ashurbanipal (r. 669–631 BC).
Apparently, an official by the name Nabu-rihtu-usur attempted to usurp the Assyrian throne with the help of another official called Sin-shar-ibni. suggest An official named Nabu-rihtu-usur attempted to seize the Assyrian throne with the help of another official called Sin-shar-ibni.
As the king's rab ša rēši, it is likely that Sin-shumu-lishir helped Ashur-etil-ilani to stop the would-be usurpers and their conspiracy appears to have been crushed relatively quickly. suggest As the king's rab ša rēši, it is likely that Sin-shumu-lishir played a role in suppressing the conspiracy, which appears to have been crushed relatively quickly.
Sin-shumu-lishir is also recorded as having been rewarded land by Ashur-etil-ilani, possibly as a reward for his aid to the king. suggest Sin-shumu-lishir is also recorded as receiving land from Ashur-etil-ilani, possibly as a rewards for his service to the king.
containing the image of a beardless king (Assyrian kings were always depicted with beards but eunuchs were always depicted beardless) could depict Sin-shumu-lishir. suggest containing the image of a beardless king could depict Sin-shumu-lishir, as Assyrian kings were always depicted with beards but eunuchs were always depicted beardless.
.svg){kind=small}
