Talk:Sólo Pienso en Ti (Lucero album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Luceropienso.jpg

Image:Luceropienso.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sólo Pienso En Ti which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 13 November 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No support at all. Andrewa (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

---

Sólo Pienso En Ti (Lucero album) → Sólo Pienso en Ti (album) – Per community consensus as marked at WP:ALBUMDAB. Also, en is a preposition; these aren't capitalized. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 11:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose again - there is a Latin Grammy winning album: Time would be better spent adding notable content: Sólo pienso en ti (Grupo Bryndis album) In ictu oculi (talk) 23:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

From WP:NALBUMS: "All articles on albums, ... must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject ... arecording may be notable if it ... at least has won or been nominated for a major music award". Now, how the article Sólo pienso en ti (Grupo Bryndis album) meets the basic WP:GNG (hint: currently it doesn't), how it has "significant coverage in reliable sources" with only one source, and how it is notable solely for winning a Grammy when NALBUMS says that that is solely a criteria for a probable notability. If the notability of the album relies in only one Grammy, and not on reliable sources and other notability terms as demanded by WP:N, it has to be merged into the parent article. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 06:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Winning a Grammy seems to more than satisfy won or been nominated for a major music award (my emphasis), so it's arguably more than probable that it's notable, if I follow your logic. This is not a !vote, as I'm acting as closing admin instead, just a comment that you might bear it in mind before rushing to AfD. Andrewa (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose so long as the article on the Grupo Bryndis album exists. It's poorly sourced now, but Spanish-language sources likely exist.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.