Talk:S-50 (Manhattan Project)/GA1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Peacemaker67 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 07:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
I'll do this one. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm doing a light c/e as I read it through, feel free to revert if I've got anything wrong.
- The first boiler was started on 15 July 1945, and operations commenced on 13 July. seems counter intuitive?
- Ooops. Typo. Should be 5 July. Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- I am not a physicist, so I can't speak for the technical aspects of the content (despite having read and reviewed several of this series of articles over the years...). I consider the article to be well written, verifiable (good quality sources and no original research), broad in its coverage of the subject, neutral, stable, and all the images are appropriately licensed and have useful captions. If the above query can be clarified and my light c/e is checked for accuracy, I believe this article meets the GA criteria. Placing it on hold for now. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- And the copyedit! Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- No prob. I always learn a lot reading these Manhattan project articles. But my physics doesn't get any better... Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:06, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- And the copyedit! Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.