Talk:S/2004 S 6
< Talk:S
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Patteroast in topic Does this belong in the hypothetical astronomical object category?
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Does this belong in the hypothetical astronomical object category?
edit- Support -- This is an unconfirmed moon, and as such hypothetical. Mrwuggs 22:56, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment+Suggestion It is a hypothetical moon, so it certainly could be added to an unconfirmed moons or hypothetical moons category, that'd be good. There are also probably more such than the three you've identified. However, I have problems with calling it a "hypothetical object" because the colloquial interpretation of this phrase is that its existence is in doubt. The existence of these objects is not in doubt - only whether they are/were moons or clumps. All the other objects in Category:Hypothetical bodies of the Solar System are way out on a limb - they've never been seen, completely unlike these three Saturnian objects. My initial suggestion would be for us to go hunt down other unconfirmed (but not purely hypothetical) bodies and put them in a Category:Unconfirmed bodies of the Solar System, and maybe make a "see also" comment in the Hypothetical bodies category. What do you think? Deuar 19:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'd throw in my support for an unconfirmed bodies category over hypothetical bodies. --Patteroast 23:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)