The contents of the S2Wa reactor page were merged into S2W reactor on 10 December 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the S2Wa reactor redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for removing my mergeto without discussion. Can you please explain what the notable difference between the S2W and S2Wa is that requires a separate article?--J Clear02:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
This reactor is basically the same as the one that was installed in the Nautilus so a separate "stub" article doesn't make sense. Merging this into the S2W article (which is also a "stub") would improve overall quality, and S2Wa should redirect to S2W. Please discuss at that article's talk page, if no opposition I'll proceed with the proposal. Regards, DPdH (talk) 19:34, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
