Talk:SBB-CFF-FFS RAe TEE II
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SBB-CFF-FFS RAe TEE II article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of SBB RAe TEE II from de.wikipedia. |
Article name
editThis article has a non standard name, probably because it was translated from its de.wikipedia counterpart and given the same name. The standardised name, according to established en.wikipedia practice, would be SBB-CFF-FFS RAe TEE II. Unless there is any objection, I will change the article's name to that name one week from today. Bahnfrend (talk) 15:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved JaGatalk 06:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
SBB RAe TEE II → SBB-CFF-FFS RAe TEE II — The requested new name is in the standard form for en.wikipedia articles about Swiss Federal Railways rolling stock (see, eg, Category:Multiple units of Switzerland). I am requesting a move only because for some reason the new name is on the titleblacklist for page moves, even though I could have created a new page under that name. (The new name seems to have fallen foul of the blacklist because it has four capital "F"s.)--Bahnfrend (talk) 02:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Commment - I know last time this issue cropt up there was a blacklist item stopping moving articles to titles with more than 9 (I think) capital letters in a row (ignoring punctuation) so you may well have fallen a foul of that. If you think this is uncontroversial it will be quicker to list it in the Uncontroversial requests section of WP:RM as then you won't have to wait a week for this discussion to finish. Dpmuk (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.