Talk:SCR-508

Military history: Aviation / Technology / North America / United States / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

Dynamotors

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why would they waste space and weight installing six dynamotors for one transceiver? One per output voltage seems more plausible. One unit with two output windings would have been even more efficient. Ref needed for this claim. 75.34.24.145 (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

sorry for the confusion. only one dyno is installed in a component. the input voltage is dependant on the vehicle output. so for a 12volt vehicle you would plug in the 12 volt dyno. the receiver component and the transmitter component are stand alone.Brian in denver (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic