Talk:SIS Building/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Reviewing this article. MWright96 (talk) 06:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• no dab links

Background

• Change modernizing to modernising
• The acronyms of the National Audit Office need to be included in brackets

Design and construction

• Remove the duplicate link to the National Audit Office
• £152.6m and £135.05m should both be changed to £152.6 million and £135.05 million
• 12,000 m2 needs a convert template with the square feet measurement included

Recent history

• Writing in The Telegraph after the attack, - Should be The Daily Telegraph for consistency

References

• no dead links
• References 10 and 15 are bare urls

That is what I found. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 13:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

@MWright96: Thank you, I've made all of your suggested changes. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 16:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Nice. Happy to promote to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)