Talk:SITE Institute

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Klbrain in topic To be confused with


Non-profit

edit

I see in the history there was a question about the group's non-profit status. Melissa Data confirms they are a registered non-profit organization. Note that non-profits can act exactly like businesses, e.g. selling professional services, without endangering their tax status; it's dependent on the ownership structure, not how they provide services. --Dhartung | Talk 17:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Secret Service Connections

edit

Looking at their history of publications and their ideological support for the "war on terror", there ought to be a sentence that includes the words mossad and cia. Sure, it may not be provable, but lots of "newspapers of record" have printed weapons of mass destruction together with Iraq in the same sentence. The language of our times is innuendo. The Matrix is all around us. [ref]the Matrix coincident[/ref] U2r2h (talk) 09:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit


108.58.107.174 (talk) 03:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

To be confused with

edit

Seems SITE Intelligence Group in fact IS exactly the same as this. Merge?פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 23:43, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merge  The 2014 Independent profile refers to SITE’s activities in 2006 and 2007.[1] SITE’s own “About” page says “MORE THAN TWO DECADES SITE Intelligence Group has provided . . .”[2] —Michael Z. 16:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support the proposal to merge, given the historical continuity of the two groups (with a change from an open to a for-profit status). The current, or most recently active, name though is the SITE Intelligence Group, suggesting that the merge should be to that page (not as currently tagged). Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 14:34, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply