Talk:SMART criteria
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMART criteria article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 230 days |
PURE goal criteria was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 July 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into SMART criteria. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
CLEAR goal criteria was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 July 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into SMART criteria. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 November 2011. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 230 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2021 and 9 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ilovesports108.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
New psychology section
editHi Ilovesports108,
I'm not keen on the new psychology section. It doesn't really relate to smart criteria specifically. It is more about goal setting more generally. That article mentions psychology quite a lot already, but maybe something from the source could be added there. I was tempted to just delete the new words, but I thought it might be a good idea to discuss it first.
Yaris678 (talk) 17:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yup, random fluff only peripherally relevant to the supposed topic of the article. Having just removed an entirely pointless and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility-violating image from this article, I decided to check back, as I had a vague recollection of nominating it for deletion. It turns out that I did so, 10 years ago to the day. [1] Given that nothing appears to have changed, and it is still the same ever-changing poorly-sourced twaddle about motivational management-speak, I may very well do the same again. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Having received no objections. I have deleted to psychology section. Yaris678 (talk) 12:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC)