Talk:SMK tank

Wrong picture

The picture with the caption "Soviet political officer during Winter War in front of SMK tank.", is infront of a T-28, not the SMK. It doesn't belong here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.80.55 (talk) 15:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Cross References

Hello and thank you for adding a piece of history here. The cross citation using the KV-1 wikipedia page doesn't meet citation standards, I think, see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Perhaps ask folks on the KV-1 talk page to help find an external citation for the finnish anti-tank claim. Love the article and work you put into it. Owlmonkey 20:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I will inquire about the source for that information. I'll also do a bit of seaching on my own but there's no certainty that I'll find the info. Anyway, thanks for the heads up. MacroDaemon 20:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

File:SMK-T-35C-Russian-Tank.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:SMK-T-35C-Russian-Tank.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 16 February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:SMK-T-35C-Russian-Tank.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Wrong photo again

The current photo shows the Soviet experimental T-100 tank, which was developed in parallel with the SMK. Protey10 (talk) 19:36, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Wrong image

See i agree Protey10 is correct it is a t-100 but the way its built is semi new with external improvements how ever technology was limited in that time period Fluffy wolfie (talk) 16:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)