Talk:SMS Arminius

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
Good articleSMS Arminius has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSMS Arminius is part of the Ironclad warships of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 13, 2011Good article nomineeListed
February 25, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Arminius/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Publisher locations needed in refs.
    Added. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Were the Krupp guns muzzle or breech-loaders? And I presume that they were rifled, right? Link to Penn and armored frigate.
    Same as in Friedrich Carl - I can't find any more information on the guns. Links added. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    No photos available on the net?
    Same as Friedrich Carl again. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Add the photo on commons and we'll be done here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

There's no source for that, and according to the WI article by Sullivan, the WZ-Bilddienst holds the copyright. When I get around to it, I'm actually going to nominate it for deletion based on that. Parsecboy (talk) 00:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Your call, but I'd like to see something, even a fair-use scan from Groener.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply