Talk:SMS Brandenburg/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The lede reads a little oddly towards the end. She spent her career in the Navy, but served in a limited capacity during the war.

   I removed the odd bit about the Imperial German Navy, that was a relic from the pre-expansion version. Parsecboy (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance:

   Need article title and place of pub for Cassier's Magazine and the article title for the United Service.

   Fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   A little odd to read so much about the maneuvers, but what the heck.

   There's not much else to say about the ship other than what's already there, so I thought I'd include it. Parsecboy (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: