Talk:SMS Breslau/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MisterBee1966 (talk · contribs) 12:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Feedback is based on Hildebrand, Röhr and Steinmetz, volume 2, pages 139–142, in no particular order. MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:57, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Hildebrand, Hans H.; Röhr, Albert; Steinmetz, Hans-Otto (1993). Die Deutschen Kriegsschiffe. Vol. 1–10. Ratingen: Mundus Verlag. ASIN B003VHSRKE.
- Christened by the mayor of Breslau
- Added. Parsecboy (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Initially only 3 smoke stacks, the 4th was added after initial sea trials (reason unknown)
- That's not supported in Gröner who shows four funnels in the 1912 drawing.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:39, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- I leave this up to you what to make of the info, maybe a footnote? MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Added it in as a note. Parsecboy (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- I leave this up to you what to make of the info, maybe a footnote? MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- That's not supported in Gröner who shows four funnels in the 1912 drawing.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:39, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- HRS page 142 state, hit by 5 mines, 330 killed but only 133 saved and taken POW
- Added a line on the discrepancy. Parsecboy (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- 2 dabs: Boiler room and Sinope
- Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- crew size is 354 up to 374 (HRS p. 139), both figures do not match 330 killed plus 133/162 rescued
- Crew size always expands during wartime, but I have no detailed information.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:39, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- Armament in 1916 was 2 × 15 cm SK L/45 guns; 10 × 10.5 cm SK L/45 guns after the battle at Odessa in April 1915. Midilli was refiited at the shipyard O.I.I. (Osmanli Imparatorlügü Istinye, Tersanesi). The 10 × 10.5 cm SK L/45 guns were replaced in July 1916 – April 1917
- This is a little confusing. My sources state two 10.5 cm guns were replaced by 15 cm guns by Feb. 1916. I don't have a good date for the replacement of the others so I can incorporate your data if you can provide complete bibliographic info.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:39, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- The source from Hownam-Meek is not used/referenced maybe move to a further reading section?
- I've moved it back into the refs as I used it to cite the 5 mines.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)