Talk:SMS Drache (1861)/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Section 1; para 1; There are many consistency errors in the the para and the infobox. Here goes the list:
Parameter Prose Infobox
Length 70.1 meters (230 ft 0 in) 62.78 m (206 ft 0 in)
Beam 14 meters (45 ft 11 in) 13.94 m (45 ft 9 in)
Draft 6.8 meters (22 ft 4 in) 6.3 m (20 ft 8 in)
Displacement 2,824 long tons/3,110 long tons 2,707 long tons
Indicated HP 1,540 kW 1,374 kW
Speed 10.5 knots (19.4 km/h; 12.1 mph) 11 knots (20 km/h; 13 mph)
Please correct these. And also mostly in many of other ship articles of Austia-Hungary (mostly done by you), used the displcament format as XXX tons (XXX long tons; XXX short tons). Please consider the same here.
Should all be fixed now.
  • Section 1; para 2; "they carried a pair of landing guns, one of which was an 8-pounder and the second was a 4-pounder", nothing about this guns was put in the infobox.
    • Added
  • Section 2; A comma (,) after "to protect Austria's coastline"
    • Added
  • Section 2.2; para 1; Remove thedup-link of Venice. First linked in para 1 of Section 2.1
    • Fixed
  • Consider adding the information about guns refitted around 1867 to the infobox.
    • Done
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:44, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, should all be done now. Parsecboy (talk) 00:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply