Talk:SMS Erzherzog Albrecht/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 13:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Section 1

• Para 1; Sentence 1; "The design for Erzherzog Albrecht was prepared by Chief Engineer Josef von Romako....", Chief Engineer of what? Please specify.
  • Reworded, see how that works.
• Para 1; Sentence 2; Add a comma(,) after "....e new ship should favor heavy armor".
  • I don't think a comma is actually necessary there, since the sentence is only talking about two things (i.e., if you simplify it, it amounts to "Romako decided the ship should have heavy armor and end-on fire").

Section 1.1

• Para 1; last sentence; There is a full stop (.) missing after "A smallconning tower was built aft of the foremast"
  • Good catch, fixed.

Section 1.2

• In the first sentence it is "24-centimeter", but in the later sentences just "cm" is used. Revise this to maintain consistency.
  • I generally like to spell out units the first time I use them and abbreviate thereafter.

Section 2

• No issues

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your review. It's worth pointing out that I just added some additional material from a book that finally came in from inter-library loan. Parsecboy (talk) 12:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

No issues with that, de-linked the dup link of Pola in the first para. Good to go. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)