Talk:SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865)
 | SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865) is part of the Ironclads of Austria-Hungary series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 10:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
GA criteria
edit
The article complies with MOS policies on layout and grammar. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
The article makes full use of the three reputable publications in its bibliography. No sign of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- (c) it contains no original research
The article seems to sufficiently cover all encyclopedic aspects of its topic for which reliable information could be obtained. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
The article's tone remains neutral throughout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Since its creation just over two months ago, this article has not endured any edit warring or similarly disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Both images used in this article are public domain, thereby do not risk fair use violation. Both serve relevant illustrative purposes with regards to the topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
The article qualifies as GA, and it's about time this review was finished. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)