Talk:SMS Hansa (1872)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   One tag that needs to be cleaned up.

   Take a look now, also incorporated the namesake there. BB-PB (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Link to central battery, biofouling. What does stiff mean? What was she named after?

   Links added, I don't know exactly what Groner means by "stiff." BB-PB (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

   B. Focused:

   Can you find any mention of her activities overseas in the NYT archives or other places?

   I've scanned through google books for contemporary accounts, but nothing turned up. I'll ask Ed about the NYT, he has more experience with their archives. BB-PB (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

   Ed pointed me in the right direction, but unfortunately, the NYT didn't have anything either (plenty on a steamship named Hansa in operation in the 1860s, and some on Hansa, which will be useful when I get around to the latter). Parsecboy (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

   Conway's says guardship after a short period overseas. Not that that's much help.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: