Talk:SMS Kaiser Max (1875)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga in topic GA Review
 | SMS Kaiser Max (1875) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | SMS Kaiser Max (1875) is part of the Ironclads of Austria-Hungary series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMS Kaiser Max (1875) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Yugoslav service
edit@Peacemaker67: - I wonder if you might have any sources that shed a bit of light on this ship's fate? Parsecboy (talk) 17:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Kaiser Max (1875)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Well constructed, will get back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Section 1
edit- Para 1; The sentence
She had a crew of 400 officers and men
is a bit confusing. A reader may get an idea that it had 400 officers alone, and also men not including in these 400. Please correct this.- This is a pretty standard way to write this, and there's no good way to change it to fix what you suggest. See for instance FAs like Japanese aircraft carrier Shinano.
Section 2
edit- Para 3; The sentence
The ship's fate after entering Yugoslav service
was abruptly cut with a full stop, not giving a information about the fate. Instead of a full stop, a semi colon (;) would help.- Good catch, fixed.
Lead
edit- I suggest replacing the word "purportedly" with its synonym, because most of the standard dictionaries don't have a definition /meaning for the word.
- This is a common word - I don't know where you looked, but it's in Merriam-Webster, the Cambridge Dictionary, and Dictionary.com (the only three I checked, surely its in others).
All good, address these suggestions and will be good to go. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 06:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. Parsecboy (talk) 09:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)