This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Technically, I see nothing wrong with the article. The ship seemingly had an uneventful service, but I do like how you put how much it was sold for and the other intricate details about it. Nothing wrong with prose, reliable sources or neutrality. The lack of an image strikes that from my checklist. As a fan of numerous references, I cannot hold you for lack of citations where they are not required. Though, "She was among the six cruisers permitted to the newly reorganized Reichsmarine by the Treaty of Versailles." Could use an inline citation if someone were to get nitpicky over it. Anyways... enough rambling on. It passes. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
