Talk:SMS Panther (1885)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Well constructed, will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

• Section 1; All good, consistency maintained, conversion templates and units are fine.
• Section 2; para 1; "Shew as completed on 31 December 1885", this sentence needs to be fixed. It is meaningless.
• Section 2; para 3; last sentence; "Britain received Leopard as a war prize in 1920", but why is Leopard mentioned here. Is there something connected to this?

@Parsecboy: Flawlessly constructed apart from some minor issues. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Both fixed, good catches on both. Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)