SMS Pommerania has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
SMS Pommerania is part of the Avisos of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Pommerania/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 16:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- She also received four 3.7 cm (1.5 in) Hotchkiss revolver cannon in 1880 British plural form of the word cannon.
- I don't know that that's specifically British.
- Damnit, I forgot that cannon could be American too.
- She left Kiel in mid-June 1871 for the first research trip Maybe link Kiel.
- Good catch
- training squadron. The ships were sent to Salonika Was this the official name of the city? Because the Thessaloniki article says that "Salonika" was written with a "c" and not a "k".
- It's an accepted spelling in English - see Thessaloniki#Names_and_etymology.
- she proceeded to Wilhelmshaven and then back through the Skagerrak Link Wilhelmshaven.
- Done
- and Skagerrak to Bergen, Norway. She then steamed south across Norway was part of the Union Sweden and Norway so maybe pipe it to it?
- Done
- She was sold in 1892 to a Hamburg-based company Link Hamburg.
- Done
- the ship was operated by the firm Paulsen & Ivers Is there a link to the firm Paulsen & Ivers?
- No, not that I'm aware of.
- but was lost with all hands on her first voyage as a merchant ship on 20 January 1894 Remove the "on 20" with "in".
- Done
- No edit wars.
Infobox
- No tonnes?
- Good catch
- No length of the long at the waterline?
- I usually only do the overall length in the box
- Link knots.
- Done
- Maybe add her renamed name in the infobox and the date or isn't that necessary?
- Added.
Images
- You have a great picture, hopefully, they'd become an FP. I can imagine that they'd be gorgeous.
- Unfortunately, it chops off the front of the ship, but it's all I've been able to find.
Sources
- Looks good to me.
- No OR.
- The sources are reliable and academic.
That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 13:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks yet again! Parsecboy (talk) 12:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)