Talk:SMS Posen/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 14:55, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am reviewing this article and it quite well written. I have only a few comments:
- Service history
- "1912 followed a similar pattern, though the summer cruise to Norway was interrupted by the Agadir crisis" - suggest rewording so sentence doesn't start with a number
- Fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 15:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Battle of Jutland
- "and straddled Indomitable several times" - is "straddled" in this context a ship term?
- It's used frequently in this context to describe a salvo of shells falling around a ship (i.e, some on one side, some on the other). Do you have any ideas how this could be made clearer? Parsecboy (talk) 15:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- "Fired several near misses"? Buggie111 (talk) 15:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- It's used frequently in this context to describe a salvo of shells falling around a ship (i.e, some on one side, some on the other). Do you have any ideas how this could be made clearer? Parsecboy (talk) 15:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Expedition to Finland
- "They departed for the Åland Islands on the following morning. Åland was to be a forward operating base, from which the port of Hanko would be secured, following an assault on the capital of Helsingfors." - I think I know what you mean, but perhaps it could be clearer.
- How does it look now? Parsecboy (talk) 15:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Xtzou (Talk) 14:55, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Looks good and I am passing the article. Xtzou (Talk) 15:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
Clearly and concisely written
- B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MoS
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 15:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review! Parsecboy (talk) 15:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)