Talk:SMS Preussen (1903)/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jim Sweeney in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
edit- The text has - eighteen 8.8 cm (3.45 in) SK L/35 quick-firing guns and the inf box - 14 × 8.8 cm (3.5 in) guns (bet this does not crop up again)
- The footnote could use a cite
- Tarrant, V. E in the bibliography could use the publishers location added
--Jim Sweeney (talk) 01:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- All fixed. You know, you make one little mistake in one infobox and then copy it over to the other four articles...thanks for catching those :) Parsecboy (talk) 11:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Passed --Jim Sweeney (talk) 14:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)