Talk:SMS Prinz Eugen (1912)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMS Prinz Eugen (1912) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | SMS Prinz Eugen (1912) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | SMS Prinz Eugen (1912) is part of the Battleships of Austria-Hungary series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 30, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Austro-Hungarian battleships Habsburg, Babenberg, Árpád, Prinz Eugen, Tegetthoff and Viribus Unitis participated in the bombardment of Ancona? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Suvıvıng parts
editI know that some guns of the Austrıan shıps where included ın the German Atlantıc wall as thıs shıp was gıven to france ıt ıs lıkly that thıs where guns of the Prınz Eugen. Flag and parts of the shıp where gıven to the German Prınz Eugen of the II WW. J —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.168.92 (talk • contribs) 05:54, 1 October 2006
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Prinz Eugen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ~NerdyScienceDude 22:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article shortly. ~NerdyScienceDude 22:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): 
c (OR):
- More citations in the "Construction" section would be nice.
- Fixed. Added some Conway's and Sokol's.--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 23:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- More citations in the "Construction" section would be nice.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- No problems here.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Looks neutral to me.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars detected.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images look good and illustrate the article.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Looks good, but I have one comment pointed out above. I will pass it once the comment has been responded to. ~NerdyScienceDude 23:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
It looks good, so I'll pass it. Congratulations! ~NerdyScienceDude 23:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on SMS Prinz Eugen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090805101618/http://www.hicon.pl:80/~pothkan/hhwn/AH-Maj.html to http://www.hicon.pl/~pothkan/hhwn/AH-Maj.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Pictures in article
editIt seems that no one has yet noticed that in this article ONE and the same picture is used for TWO different events and times: "Prinz Eugen in 1914" and "Prinz Eugen underway on a rare departure from port on 28 June 1917" - SAME BOW WAVE!!! 80.151.9.187 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)