| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMS Prinz Heinrich article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | SMS Prinz Heinrich has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | SMS Prinz Heinrich is part of the Armored cruisers of Germany series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 21, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the German armored cruiser SMS Prinz Heinrich (pictured) set the design standard for all subsequent armored cruisers built for the Kaiserliche Marine? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Prinz Heinrich/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 21:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose:
(MoS):
- prose:
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
edit1. as opposed Fürst Bismarck. Suggest - as opposed to the Fürst Bismarck
- Added "to", though I don't like using "the" with a ship name, but that's just a taste issue. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
2. including during the Battle of the Gulf of Riga in August 1915. Suggest - and was involved in the Battle of the Gulf of Riga in August 1915
- Sounds good. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
3. hp in the infobox could do with a link.
- Added. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
4. and used in several secondary roles. Suggest - and was used in several secondary roles
- Good call. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
5. amidships could do with a link.
- Added. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
6. and a top speed of. Suggest - and had a top speed of
- Works for me. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
7. with relief effort. Suggest - with the relief effort
- I'm not sure why I missed so many little things like that - must've been distracted when I wrote the article. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
8. Miller apparatus. Suggest a link for this
- I don't know that there'll ever be an article for this. I've only seen it referenced in the article in Industrial Magazine (and its probably an informal name for whatever the USN designated it as).
9. Suggest a link for van.
- Added. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
10. von Ingenohl. Is he the ships Capitan?
- The admiral of the fleet - I've clarified this. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 21:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Nice work Parsec, once again. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 15:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)