Talk:SMS Prinzess Wilhelm

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Thurgate in topic GA Review
Good articleSMS Prinzess Wilhelm has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSMS Prinzess Wilhelm is part of the Irene class cruisers series, a good topic. It is also part of the Protected cruisers of Germany series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 25, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
September 9, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Subscript text

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Prinzess Wilhelm/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 19:25, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    prose:   (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
     
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit

1. engine problems limited her to half-speed. Suggest - as engine problems limited her to half-speed

Works for me. Thanks for the review. Parsecboy (talk) 21:55, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 19:25, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Passed. Good job Parsec. Thurgate (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply