Talk:SMS Rheinland/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    Fix the things I've noted in the text.
    I reworded the first and clarified the second. How does it look now? Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
    B. MoS compliance:  
    Publisher location needed for Tarrant
    Added. Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Is another picture available?
    I haven't been able to find any other images of the ship; there's a somewhat bad linedrawing in the 1911 Brasseys (here) - that might be worth uploading and adding to the article. I did add a photo of the Black Prince to the Jutland section. Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
    I like plan views for all of these early dreadnoughts so you can show what the odd turret arrangements looked like rather than relying only on a textual description. But it's your call, though I'd look for a better scan than that one.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: