Talk:SMS Salamander (1861)/GA1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Section 1; para 1; There are many consistency errors in the the para and the infobox. Here goes the list:
Parameter Prose Infobox Length 70.1 meters (230 ft 0 in) 62.78 m (206 ft 0 in) Beam 14 meters (45 ft 11 in) 13.94 m (45 ft 9 in) Draft 6.8 meters (22 ft 4 in) 6.3 m (20 ft 8 in) Displacement 2,824 long tons 2,707 long tons Indicated HP 1,540 kW 1,374 kW Speed 10.5 knots (19.4 km/h; 12.1 mph) 11 knots (20 km/h; 13 mph)
- Please correct these. And also mostly in many of other ship articles of Austia-Hungary (mostly done by you), used the displcament format as XXX tons (XXX long tons; XXX short tons). Please consider the same here.
- Should all be fixed - another editor wrote up the design section and infobox, and their stuff is usually pretty squared away, so I didn't really look at it closely.
- Section 2; sentence 1; Explain about Drache on its first mention i.e it is the sister ship, than in the later sentence.
- Fixed
- Section 2; sentence 2; Remove the dup-link of Drache
- Done
- Section 2; A comma (,) after "to protect Austria's coastline"
- Added
- Section 2; Link "Denmark"
- Done
- Section 2.1; para 3; sentence 1; "By this time, Re d'Italia had been rammed and sunk and the coastal defense ship Palestro was burning", the use of "and" is a bit confusing, revise.
- Removed the "rammed and", which should hopefully clear it up a bit
- Section 2.2; para 1; Remove thedup-link of Venice. First linked in para 1 of Section 2.1
- Done
- Consider adding the information about guns refitted around 1867 to the infobox.
- Added
- Consistency error between lead, prose, and infobox. The year for "broken-up", in the lead it is 1896, in prose (section 2.2) it is 1895–1896, and in infobox it is 1895. Please correct them.
- Good catch, fixed.
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 13:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)