Talk:SMS Schwaben/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jim Sweeney in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Comments

edit
  1. The text states there were six 45 cm (18 in) torpedo tubes while the inf box has 5 × 45 cm (17.7 in) torpedo tubes
  2. The footnote could use a cite
  3. The inf box has - Fate: Scrapped in 1920 but the text says - battleship was stricken from the naval register on 8 March 1921 needs clarification

--Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

All three fixed, thanks for reviewing the article, Jim. Parsecboy (talk) 11:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply